News

News

GF Bearing vs. Plain Bearing: Smarter Design for Solar Trackers

 
In solar tracking systems, bearing performance is critical to long-term stability and smooth operation. This article compares two commonly used structures: the GF Bearing Assembly and the traditional Plain Bearing Assembly. Here's why GF Bearings offer a smarter solution.

Introduction – Features of GF Bearings

  • High mechanical strength
  • Durability
  • Superior UV and Weather Resistance
  • Maintenance-Free
  • ±10° Swing angle
  • Environmental Adaptability
  • Easy Installation

GF Bearings VS. Plain Bearings

Feature

GF Bearing Assembly
Plain Bearing Assembly

Swing Angle

Installation

Easy and fast; no need for high-precision alignment
Slower; high installation accuracy required

Inner Bearing Retention

Ball core securely fixed, not easy to fall out
Ball may fall out under long-term radial stress

Tolerance to Structural Deformation

Can accommodate slight tracker deformation or misalignment
Sensitive to misalignment; performance degrades with structure shift
Maintenance
Low friction, low noise, maintenance-free
May require periodic inspection or lubrication depending on material
 

Why GF Bearings Are Better Than Plain Bearings?

  • ±10° Swing Angle – Allows self-alignment and absorbs structural deformation.

  • Easy Installation – No need for perfect alignment or ground flatness.

  • Secure Inner Core – Ball core is tightly fixed and won't fall out under long-term axial load.

  • More Reliable – Better long-term performance with lower failure risk.

Conclusion

GF Bearings offer a smarter, more robust solution for solar tracker systems by combining flexibility, easy installation, and long-term reliability. For developers and EPC contractors seeking lower maintenance and better performance, the GF Bearing is the clear choice over traditional plain bearing designs.